Check out the list of techniques. Does any of this sound familiar?
- How to talk to reporters and a "do's and don'ts" list for officials. Nothing is left to chance.
- Creating a citizens review committee .... Calling it "an extra layer of insurance,"...
- Packing public meetings with supporters. It actually says that!
- Message discipline, ... Talk to enough officials and you're bound to hear the same story again and again. Evidently to them, repetition is an argument!
- The Lew Edwards Group also directed officials to conduct hundreds of meetings with various community groups. Sound familiar?
- "...Repeatedly express the need for projects and avoid ... discussions about costs."
- ... Officials intentionally remained vague about where [the] hospital would be built because they didn't want to galvanize NIMBYs (residents) who didn't want a hospital with a helicopter pad near their homes. (Keep any bad parts of the plan a secret!)
- One Councilman had the audacity to be thinking of the needs of the people, saying the bond was too much of a burden on the taxpayer and cast the lone vote against placing it on the ballot. He was chastised -- by Lew Edwards' assertion that unanimous support would be important to the bond's success.
- In total, Lew Edwards was paid nearly $450,000. In their defense, they said "Some ... Was spent on office supplies..." etc.
Read that last paragraph, the comments from a professor of political science:
"It's become very professionalized, and there are these groups that roam the land offering their services," said Sparrow, the SDSU professor. "They've got the money, the tools and the off-the-shelf plan for doing these things. It makes kind of a mockery of the whole thing, but that's the way you've got to get things passed. . . . You've got to play no-error ball."
I particularly like that characterization as a group that roams the land. Does that sound familiar?
No comments:
Post a Comment