Saturday, January 28, 2012

Bay Area Public Employee Salaries 2010

At Thursday’s Manteca Patriots (Tea Party) there was a fine fellow running for office who pledge that he would only accept a salaryguy's card  of $42,500 per year.  Because, he put it, you shouldn’t be “getting rich off the taxpayer who’s making less than you.”

Fantastic concept.  I noted at the meeting that “everybody in the city makes more than that, they all make like 100,000/yr.” 

Well this comment drew some reaction.  I don’t know if it’s how I said it or if I was over broad in my generalization but it got some hostile rebuttal (I was interrupted) from someone who thought that was a bunch of crap, basically.  That these city workers were … and I’m not quite sure what his argument was.  But that “they aren’t all making over $100,000 /yr!

Fair enough.

As I tried to explain at the meeting I was speaking in general terms and not every single worker makes that much.  Some make more, some make less.  But that as an average it’s right around (in the neighborhood) of 100K or so. 

Now, here’s the basis for that comment.  First, City Manager Pinkerton said this very thing at a meeting of the “tax committee” I forget the name of it but was the citizen’s group that met to try to explore any new taxes.  (Which were soundly turned down).  He said as a general rule, he counts about $100K per employee.  Including the guys who mow the grass who get like $80K and so on.

In addition, in the “COPS” grant application, Chief Bricker had listed the starting compensation for a brand new policeman as $114,000 per year.   To start.  Councilman Moorhead even asked for clarification.  (“Is that what it really cost to hire one policeman?”) The answer from the chief was yes, that’s what it costs.  About the same with the fire department.  And the pay goes up from there.  $114,000 per year is the absolute minimum.

I also asserted that the gentleman may simply not know how much they make.  And I related how when the Sun Post ran a list of all city worker pay, they got many complaints and downright accusations of “I don’t make that much.”  I asserted “they don’t even know what they make, they argue but the figures in the Sun Post were accurate.”  This was also disputed.

Now, read for yourself.  Here is all 560 city workers’ pay.  Look for yourself.  I’ll wait.

Now, if you notice, the “median” just directly from that list is $77,300 per year.   Now if you want to go further, notice the last 140 workers are part time, one time, special workers who get a few thousand dollars.  Lets just look at full time workers.  Fair?  Maybe, maybe not but lets just say the small payments less than $10,000 don’t count.  Now the median pay is $90,380 per year.

OK, so mea culpa, they aren’t making 100K a year, it’s only $90K.  I’m sorry to have even suggested they are making a good living.  Wait, the argument was if they were making more than the average Californian, $42,500. 

Lastly, remember I said “they don’t even know how much they make?”  Well, look at the San Jose Mercury News page.  Look at the first comment from a government worker there.  Accusing the paper of getting it all wrong, and insisting “I don’t make that much money.”  Which is exactly what I said at the meeting, that the workers themselves don’t even know how much they are getting.

And there’s nothing like that in the private (non government) world, but that’s a subject for another day.

You may use the space below in the comments to apologize for doubting my figures.

Bay Area Public Employee Salaries 2010 - San Jose Mercury News

Monday, December 26, 2011

Happy Santa - Santa Claus - Southbury, Connecticut

happysantaFrom the odd file: This guy, along with his wife and three grandchildren were killed in a horrific fire – Christmas morning.

Happy Santa - Santa Claus - Southbury, Connecticut

Pictured:  All five who died in fire on Christmas.  From Happy Santa.

Sunday, November 20, 2011

Thursday, November 03, 2011

Friday, October 21, 2011

Moon rocks.

Looking for the video of my visit to the moon rock exhibit? Me too. Something has malfunctioned in the video camera. I'm working on it but it may take some time and I'm not sure if it exists or not. - sorry about that.

To the teachers who were kind enough to answer questions and the parent and child who showed me her moon drawing thank you for doing that sorry about the problems with the video.  (I know I should remember your name but that was on the tape!)

Monday, August 08, 2011

Forecast of doom?

Here in 16 seconds I list all the bad things that might happen in the next four years.

 

Get Microsoft Silverlight

Streaming Archive

Wednesday, July 20, 2011

Pointed commentary cuts video feed.

Last night’s council meeting.  For some odd reason the police were limiting the number of people in the meeting. 

So I had to ask to bring some business before the council to get in.  Which I did.  Well, apparently my probing questions broke the TV camera! 

Get Microsoft Silverlight

It turns out there was some controversy. There was a group of disgruntled citizens there to protest the gunning down of one of their community members. For some reason.

Wednesday, June 08, 2011

Here's the video from last night. I barely escaped!

Get Microsoft Silverlight

Thursday, March 17, 2011

Wednesday, March 02, 2011

Monday, November 01, 2010

Election Day II

I forgot to mention, I’ve forgiven David Harmer.  The reasons: Every candidate has some goons and/or idiots hanging around him.  I don’t blame Rand Paul for the fight that took place outside where he was debating.  No matter how unfortunate the events were you just can’t blame him!

Also, I don’t think they picked me out.  It’s not like they said “there’s that ‘joe’ – Get him!”   They volunteers were just incompetent morons.

And lastly the Congress of the United States isn’t about my feelings; it’s about electing someone who will make wise decisions and keep us free.

Election Day!

I wasn’t going to come out with any “recommendations” this year.  I didn’t feel like gumming up the political process too much.  But I can’t resist at least saying where I’m leaning on election day:

For Mayor of Manteca, Carlon Perry is the obvious choice.  We are also electing two councilmen:  I’d go with Richard Behling, he seems like a smart guy who understands some deep concepts about the role of government.  And for the other council position – I have no idea, name your poison.

For Governor of California, Meg Whitman and for senator Carly Fiorina.  At least they created at least one job in their lives, which is more than Brown or Boxer have done.

There’s a bunch more candidates.  But no stand outs so you might as well let your parakeet peck at the sample ballot and pick one.  Or – NONE.  Yes, you can pick “none.”  You just don’t vote for those.  It will count as an “undervote” but the rest of the ballot will count.  There’s no requirement to vote for every single office or every single ballot measure if you don’t know which to pick.  Check with election officials if you don’t believe me.

So far as propositions:  Prop 19 is a step in the right direction – just in terms of “harm reduction” regardless if you believe using marijuana is good or bad.  No one will make you “smoke pot” and if there are those that say it helps them, what do I care?  Get the government out of this equation.

I’m still analyzing some of the others.  Here, rather than spoon feed you the proposition numbers and a “yes/no” I’ll just spout a few principles to keep in mind.

There’s a proposition on suspending AB32, the “Global Warming®” law.  That’s a no brainer – of course yes, suspend it.  In this economy?  And the whole fear of global Al Goreism is way overblown.  Way.

Currently, the legislature has to agree on a budget with a 2/3 vote.  We want that.  I don’t care how late the budget is.  If you lower that to simple majority, that will just make it “easier” to spend your money on a budget that’s not so agreeable.  Also, if you cut the legislators’ pay if the budget is late – you’ll get a budget on time even if it’s the worst budget on earth.

Lets see what else there is… this ballot looks like the SAT…..

Saturday, September 18, 2010

The power of one, part II

Now we see the real power of one, finally.  Here in this video clip.

This occurred after the harassment at my seat in the back for roughly 5 minutes, the “guy” chasing me around causing a disturbance and after I asked for simple clarification “Am I allowed to film here, yes or no?”  Which no one would answer.  (Except “the guy” who had no authority to be harassing me and telling me not to film.) 

Notice after all this, now a 2nd Harmer staffer is stepping in front of me.  The original guy hasn’t given up, and now also Sara Blicharz is moving in front of me to obstruct and interfere with me.  That’s at least three “after me” not including another nondescript fellow moving around the place with some urgency.

Now, in this video we pick up as the 2nd Harmer staff, the first harassing guy and Sara Blicharz attack.  At this point, one courageous citizen has the guts to stand up and ask the obvious:

Why are you bothering this guy?  Everyone else is filming; there’s a fellow filming right there (points to the center) who’s been sitting there filming the whole time….

He didn’t get much of an answer; but the question was enough. 

And guess what, the harassment stopped.    This ended the incident for practical purposes.  Suddenly no one cared what I did or where I sat, no one bothered me.  This is after telling the harasser didn’t work; telling the Harmer team didn’t work.  Talking to Blicharz didn’t work.  The power of one man’s objection was the only thing that meant anything.

Note the calm at the end of the video.  hmm.

By the way, I’m sorry for so many “guys” in this story and so few names.   I count “guy1 thru guy4” And I think I do know the guy who stood up for me he was familiar, but I just can’t be sure the video is unclear.  But I’ll be sure to thank him when I see him next.

Oh, and just to answer one more question I’ve been asked why didn’t you simply ask if it was ok or not.  Well, I did.  Here.  Note how Blicharz carefully considers my question, fully investigates my complaint, and politely explains….  (cough)

This clip is just a minute prior to the above clip.  I’ll… just let it speak for itself.  Viewer discretion is advised, due to it’s content, this video is not suitable for viewing.  By anyone:

Previously, part I here.

Friday, September 17, 2010

The power of one, part I

This is simply an accounting of the events of Sep 14, 2010, at the Meeting of the South San Joaquin Republicans.

The Manteca Bulletin, at first, reported that for some inexplicable reason, some madman just got up and disrupted the meeting.  It was only after I demanded the correct story be told that the Bulletin re-wrote their accounting of events.  Maybe I’m just sensitive, but there’s something about being called a “meeting disrupter” that bothered me.  I went to the meeting just to hear and support my candidates in peace; I brought a camcorder because it might be interesting, I guess, I really didn’t have any reason.  But there were dozens of both still and video cameras going in that room. 

I know this is a boring accounting but here it is.  By the way no one now disputes this what really occurred so I don’t know why I bother, but just for the record:

Image9503  About an hour into the meeting, I’ve been sitting there filming whatever I thought might be interesting.  I’ve been filming for 31 minutes, 22 seconds when some guy sits down next to me and tells me he’s going to ask me to leave if I don’t stop filming.  I pointed out the obvious (I’m invited, the leader of the meeting knows I’m filming and never complained, everyone else is filming, etc..  So I’m confused and just “thanked him” for letting me know.)  But continued filming on and off, just as I did for all the other candidates there.

Image9509Note I’m clearly in the back of the room, in a chair, minding my own business.  The “harassment” from this “guy” has been going on for 4 minutes, 20 seconds.

Image9517 So I get up and move from the back, and this guy gets up to follow me.  This is at :36 minutes, 00 sec.

Image9519 He followed close.  Only 4 seconds to catch me.

 

Image9522 trying to block my view, and you can see, again, I’m still at the back of the room.

 Image9525I’m moving toward the front now, a look back – see who’s following me?  And who else?Image9526 Image9527At the front, but even here, note I’m on the left front, not directly in front of the speaker.

Image9528 But I’m “pushed” closer to the center.

Image9530 Now someone is on the move, see the figure in the rear right?  (under the “2” in 0:37:02)

Image9532 We have our little dispute.  Some words are said.  You don’t have to lecture me, I know there are always better ways to handle things; but cut me a break, I’m being harassed here!

Image9546 So now I’ve moved to the back again.  Now a 2nd guy starts jumping in my way, blocking my view.

 Image9551 Now the same guy hasn’t given up! 

Image9552He’s still harassing me.  And wait a sec, who’s that other body on the right that’s stepped in front of me?

Next:  Part II: The Power of One.

Friday, August 06, 2010

Saturday, July 03, 2010

New edgy presidential address

This is how it's starting to look to me:

Weekly Address: Jobs Creation from White House Weekly Address on Vimeo.


Happy Independence Day!

Thursday, June 24, 2010

What scoundrel took my flag?

fog 005

It went missing Wednesday morning.  Probably some communist. And they took the pole too!